The word "Virus"
It´s time to stop using that word
To the “Truth Movements” :
We need to stop using the word virus. We need to stop saying “viruses are not what we were told”
There is no such thing as a “virus” proven to exist in humans, animals, or plants.
We do not need antivaccine movements to fight for a “safe vaccine” , we need courage to see outside Plato's cave. There will be no place for Vaccines when we realize that there is nothing to vaccinate for.
Imagine a conversation from the “truth communities” debating about the real origin of some “ genetic sequences “ .... sounds more ... scientific , more real ? If that sequences exist in the real world of course, not in a software. ( and whatever a gene is or is not )
If we don’t stop we will keep feeding the beast. The word “Vaccine” needs the word “Virus”
Harmless Virus = Virus
Virus means Poison right ?
There is no “Harmless Poison”, Duesberg did his best to fight the genocide in the 80´ and was one of the first leaders to stand up for the truth about the Aids Scam, but it was not enough.
The Perth Group is now , after 40 years , being recognized for their outstanding scientific work.
They had a very clear focus and the courage to stand still for it: They went to the bottom of the scam, the very deep secret kept under a thousand locks.... the very existence of the famous “retro-virus”. There was nothing there, and they used the same official documents to show the world that what was called HIV was never proven to exist.
Stefan Lanka fought for the very same reason, he is another one that went out from the Plato's cave and had no fear to go back and tell everyone, and he won the measles case in supreme court, he proved that Enders paper ( the fundational paper on which the Virology stands ) DID NOT PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF A VIRUS.
There was an opportunity lost in the 80´ to show the world that there was a pseudoscience called virology. Maybe because, as in Plato's cave.... all people heard about in their lives were the words Virus, Contagious and Vaccines.
The tittle , just the title of Duesberg book ( “Inventing the Aids Virus “ ) , was all that people needed from Duesberg plus his Name on it, and the Forewords by his friend Mullis, the creator of the “plandemics machine generator” or PCR . Mullis also believed in phantom viruses , but we have to say that he was awakened to the pseudoscience used for genocide and control and fought in his way against those powers, sometimes…
Why do some people in the terrain community still talk about “we are 68% viruses “ “they are our friends ! “, please tell me why ? Don’t they know what triggers in people’s minds when they mention “we are 68% poison “ we have poison as our Ally ! We are made of Poison !
Why do some people in the truth community still talk about 8% being Endogenous Retroviruses ?? That was also a problem in the 80´ We found HERVs ! “ That´s it ! They are part of us !
Its all endogenous , but why still use retro and virus ? Did we learn something in this 40 years ? RNA -- to --> DNA is not the exception , more the rule ?? Who knows.
Didn´t we know that the enzyme RT was not something special to look for , and instead more than 50% of our cells are using RT ?? So what was all that about finding RT ? Or finding human proteins ? Sometimes the truth is so easy to understand, that people need to complicate it.
Why do we accept the term Virus-like particles VLPs ? If we do not have Viruses to compare with ? , what is something that is like something that doesn´t exist ??
We need to banish the word Virus and take it out of our conversations... replace it with something else if you want ! Maybe something that was really seen from a sample without alteration , under electron microscope for example ... ( If we can see anything from real life under an electron microscope at all ).
Don’t you know that when you see a term used in the opposite meaning , you are using Mason’s way to talk ? Don’t you know that by using a word but meaning the opposite ( like in isolation of “viruses”) you are promoting a schizophrenic society ? Did you read the book 1984 ??
Why people in the antivaccine community don’t want to listen when you put in their face the CDC saying on print “ no records of isolation from a sample taken directly from human exist for any virus ( HIV HPV SARSCov2, etc ) “, “because that is beyond What virology can do ???? “ AntiVax leaders say “ I´m not a virologist “ and I don’t want to scare people ¡?¡?, so then why do you talk about a phantom thing you don’t know , using the word “virus” ? If you are not a virologist, and that´s why you cannot discuss the non-existence of viruses , but you can affirm that viruses exist, because...... because.... everyone knows that ! ( everyone inside Plato's cave ) .
We cannot name something with a word that has been used for more than 100 years by controllers to confuse, control, and harm . We need to stop.
We cannot use the only word that allows the system to make and accept “vaccines” to destroy health and reduce population.
We cannot debate using that word , which is not a thing but a concept , or an idea or an illusion call it what you want, because if we mention that word we trigger in the audience what they saw in Plato's cave . Even if that audience is a little bit awake , the idea implanted using that word in the past ( with the fear ) has the power to block their mind , put it in automatic mode, and keep the hypnosis, taking out all critical thinking.
“no pathogenic viruses proven to exist” is not enough, NO VIRUS WAS PROVEN TO EXIST.
“no virus proven to cause any disease” is not enough , NO VIRUS WAS PROVEN TO EXIST
“viruses are not what we are told” is not enough, VIRUSES ARE JUST A CONCEPT THAT ONLY EXIST IN PEOPLE’S MIND
We all have to be very careful when talking about cellular debris or “exosomes” .... We need to avoid using a word that represents absolutely nothing in nature. Because then, that nothing, will be filled with FEAR.
God Bless you all,
Misha