What is Children´s Health really Defending ?
From their articles, it seems they are energetically defending two illusions: COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2.
We are aware of the great effort and achievements made all these years by CHD in the fight against what they call unsafe vaccines with adverse effects. I think the whole world must say thanks to their constant work; a lot of lives were saved because of CHD's achievements.
But in the actual context of human extermination, there are some actions taken by CHD that are not clear enough. The message from CHD is not clear enough.
From their articles, it seems they are energetically defending two illusions: COVID-19 and SARS-CoV2.
Why ? WHO knows.
If that is not the case, why do they need to defend both legs of the same scam?
For the alleged pathogen, they show a secret origin (already promoted by MSM): a lab leak. The result: Keep going with the "virus" illusion, the "mutations," and the need for a vaccine, excuse me, a "safe vaccine," of course, whatever that means.
For the alleged new contagious illness, they insist that there are treatments for it (the same done by MSM): ivermectin, Chloroquine or Hydroxychloroquine, and "natural immunity." The result: Keep going with the contagious myths and iatrogenic practices.
My father used to tell me that you can only know a person by their actions, and the problem I find now on the CHD website is that the actions taken by them are (either intentional or not) :
1. Promoting the Lab Leak Narrative
2. Promoting treatments for a non-illness
Basically, they are following the course of the official narrative.
In October of 2017, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security released "The SPARS Pandemic, 2025–2028: A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators,", and on page 66, yes, page 66:
... “A widespread social media movement led primarily by outspoken parents of affected children, coupled with widespread distrust of “big pharma,” supported the narrative that the development of SPARS MCMs was unnecessary and driven by a few profit-seeking individuals. Conspiracy theories also proliferated across social media, suggesting that the virus had been purposely created and introduced to the population by drug companies or that it had escaped from a government lab secretly testing bioweapons. “
Anyway, the good news is that more and more people are waking up to the truth that COVID is not a defined illness and SARSCov2 is nothing but a software-generated code, no matter how many articles CHD publishes on their website.
We need to remember that there is no need for vaccines when you realize that there is nothing to vaccinate against.
There is no vaccine for FEAR.
Misha
Below are some articles published on the CHD website (from 1-1-2022 to 3-3-2023):
1. Given that CHD admit they are open to the 'no virus' stance and are happy for their audience to make up their own mind I suggested they publish two versions of their articles and videos (1) a version promoting 'viruses', 'covid', 'lab leaks' and vaccines (2) a version that stays true to science.
2. A common defence is that the 'no virus' position might be technically true, but it's a losing strategy for winning the hearts and minds blah blah ... but if that was true the mainstream media would point to the 'no virus' camp as the opposition to the official narrative and completely ignore the likes of CHD, Malone, McCullough etc in order to depict the 'health freedom movement' in the worst possible light.
3. The medical science vs medical tyranny war is primarily a war of words (terminology). To use words like virus, immunity, gain of function etc is to concede everything from the outset and lose the war all by yourself.
4. The idea that we have to convince everyone to accept the 'no virus' stance in order to win the war for health freedom is false. Victory is secured when it's considered acceptable to debate the topic in the mainstream public discourse. If civilised debate is considered valid, then dissent is valid. If dissent is valid than there can be no coercion, no mandates, no tyranny. To simply HAVE the debate is to win. Even the fact that virology doesn't have a leg to stand on is of secondary importance.
The Queen Bee of this hive mentality and that which must be preserved at all costs is indeed the embedded belief in the existence of viruses. So they support the existence of all viruses thus the need for the entire childhood vaccine schedule( 78 injections before the age of 7). Their issue is safety,not necessity. Louis Pasteur admitted in his private notes that his germ theory was bullshit,supported by blatant fraud,his own. Well at least he admitted it, although stipulated that his private notes ( 3,000 words) only be released after his death.